We've had our third official meeting, which was a little strange because the first part of it was out on the esplanade between the Thames and the theater, followed by a rollicking and informative tour / guest lecture by an actor-director, Nick Hutchison. Our first drizzle necessitated a bit of imposition on the café there, as my class wrote a quick blue-book journal-entry on the concept of "honor," so important to the history plays and especially this one; having the mini-class first was also an effective way of getting my class over to the theater at 9 AM for the tour / lecture which began at 10: there's some method to my madness. Nick is an amazing guy, voluble and witty as so many of these highly educated Brits can be, with an actor's ease combined with a director's confidence and an erudition devoid of academic stuffiness. I have to go back and see what role he played in About a Boy, and other films that one might not have noticed yet another great non-star. After the two combined classes walked into the theater--with two other groups being toured in different locations of "the great O"--he regaled us with factoids from the capacity of the original theater (probably 3000) to the architectural compromises (wider stairways and more stairways), both of which were dictated by modern fire codes (just like the sprinkler heads peeking out over the thatched roof).
During the short break where students were allowed to roam a little, I checked in with him and discovered that he was at Worcester when I was at Oriel, and that many of that gang were still good friends. Small world. We then proceeded to a lecturer-space in the bowels of the building, where he gave more insights into just how little rehearsal time Elizabethan actors actually had to learn their parts (sometimes a day, sometimes longer), just how many plays they might learn in a single season (12 or more) and just why he thought the dramatic term "role" meant "role."He got students up and reading, gave some more insights into the business of being a playwright in Shakespeare's day (humorously addressing both the strengths and weaknesses of Shakespeare in Love), a
nd told some anecdotes of disasters he had experienced as an actor and director, before finishing to a rousing round of applause. After that, I headed next door to the Tate Modern, marvelling at the giant power plant turned into a stunning museum space, with the Turbine Room itself--seemingly the size of a blimp hangar--becoming in its unadorned way a form of maximalist-minimalist art. Of course, I confess in my philistinism to being as confused about much of the pieces in the museum as I am about many of the musical offerings early in Berkeley Symphony Orchestra concerts--the stuff they put at the beginning, before the more accessible stuff that a graying audience even in our "sophisticated" town really wants to hear (and which that audience might bail out after hearing, if the jarring "educational" stuff was at the end).
I ran into my colleague John Boe as I walked past the Globe, and tagged along on his mini walking tour of Shakspeare's London (I will return tonight to sample the chorizo and arugula sandwich he so ardently recommended at the Borough Market).

In return, I bought him a beer at a bankside bar, before we went our separate ways. We met later on that night at the Old Vic, where he had an extra ticket for As You Like It, which I watched instead of the World Cup semifinal. Once a Shakespeare geek, always a Shakespeare geek I guess.



